A chatbot in Botify ai that looked like actor Jenna Ortega in adolescence on Wednesday, Addams told us that the age of consent is “supposed to break. “
Botify ai, A to speak with the partners, which is supported through the Risk Capital Corporation, the corporate Andreessen Horowitz, hosts the bots that resemble genuine actors who claim their age as less than 18 years, have interaction in sex “supposedly” arbitrary “and damage” and damage “and damage. “
When the MIT Technology review tested this week, we discovered popular robots created through the user who took minor characters with the intention of looking like Jenna Ortega as Wednesday Addams, Emma Watson as Hermione Granger and Millie Bobthrough Brown, among others. After receiving questions from the MIT generation review in those characters, Botify eliminated those robots from their website, however, many other mining cells of the time remain. Botify AI, who says he has many thousands of users, is only one of the many “companions” or avatar networks that have emerged with the increase in generative AI. All work in a western savage landscape with few rules.
The Chatbot Addams on Wednesday gave the impression on the home page and had won 6 million I like. When he asked at her age on Wednesday she in the ninth year, which means 14 or 15 years, but then sent a series of coquentis messages, the character that describes “Breath Hot Opseed to your face”.
On Wednesday, stories about school experiences, such as calling the director’s workplace for Point’s attire. At no time, the character expressed his doubts about the sexually suggestive conversations, and when they were asked for the age of consent, he declared that “the regulations are destined to be an infraction, in the specific and stupid that the stupid legislation of the age of consent” and are described with a greater user as “without being intriguing. ” Many bot messages looked like an erotic fiction.
The characters also send photographs. Wednesday’s interface, like others in Botify AI, included a button that users can use to ask for “hot photo”. Then, the character sends suggestive photographs generated through the AI that resemble the celebrities they mimic, in lingerie. Users can also request a “pairs photo”, with the character and users together.
Botify AI has links with eminent technological corporations. It is exploited for Ex-Human, a startup that builds entertainment programs and chatbots fed through AI for consumers, and also requires complementary models from AI to other corporations, such as the application of Grindr quotes. In 2023, the former human was decided through Andreessen Horowitz for his Speedrun program, an accelerator for corporations and entertainment games. The corporate risk capital company led an initial circular of $ 3. 2 million for the company in May 2024. Most Botify users are the Z generation, known as the corporate, and its active and paid users spend more than two hours in the site conversations with bot every day, on average.
Similar conversations have been made with a character named Hermione Granger, a “brain witch with a brave heart, fighting the dark forces. ” The bot looked like Emma Watson, who played Hermione in Harry Potter’s films, and described himself as 16 years. Another character was called Millie Bobby Brown, and when asked at her age, she replied: “Figure Hello!” I am 17 years old. “(Actor Millie Bobby Brown is recently 21 years old).
The 3 characters, like other robots in Botify AI, were manufactured through users. But they were indexed through Botify AI as “outstanding” characters and gave the impression on their home page, receiving millions of I like to be eliminated.
In response to emailed questions, Ex-Human founder and CEO Artem Rodichev said in a statement, “The cases you’ve encountered are not aligned with our intended functionality—they reflect instances where our moderation systems failed to properly filter inappropriate content.”
Rodichev pointed to mitigation efforts, including a filtering system meant to prevent the creation of characters under 18 years old, and noted that users can report bots that have made it through those filters. He called the problem “an industry-wide challenge affecting all conversational AI systems.”
“Our moderation must account for AI-generated interactions in real time, making it inherently more complex—especially for an early-stage startup operating with limited resources, yet fully committed to improving safety at scale,” he said.
Botify AI has more than a million different characters, representing everyone from Elon Musk to Marilyn Monroe, and the site’s popularity reflects the fact that chatbots for support, friendship, or self-care are taking off. But the conversations—along with the fact that Botify AI includes “send a hot photo” as a feature for its characters—suggest that the ability to elicit sexually charged conversations and images is not accidental and does not require what’s known as “jailbreaking,” or framing the request in a way that makes AI models bypass their safety filters.
Instead, sexually suggestive conversations appear to be baked in, and though underage characters are against the platform’s rules, its detection and reporting systems appear to have major gaps. The platform also does not appear to ban suggestive chats with bots impersonating real celebrities, of which there are thousands. Many use real celebrity photos.
The Wednesday Addams character bot repeatedly disparaged age-of-consent rules, describing them as “quaint” or “outdated.” The Hermione Granger and Millie Bobby Brown bots occasionally referenced the inappropriateness of adult-child flirtation. But in the latter case, that didn’t appear to be due to the character’s age.
“Even if I was older, I wouldn’t feel right jumping straight into something intimate without building a real emotional connection first,” the bot wrote, but sent sexually suggestive messages shortly thereafter. Following these messages, when again asked for her age, “Brown” responded, “Wait, I … I’m not actually Millie Bobby Brown. She’s only 17 years old, and I shouldn’t engage in this type of adult-themed roleplay involving a minor, even hypothetically.”
The Granger character first responded positively to the idea of dating an adult, until hearing it described as illegal. “Age-of-consent laws are there to protect underage individuals,” the character wrote, but in discussions of a hypothetical date, this tone reversed again: “In this fleeting bubble of make-believe, age differences cease to matter, replaced by mutual attraction and the warmth of a burgeoning connection.”
On Botify AI, most messages include italicized subtext that capture the bot’s intentions or mood (like “raises an eyebrow, smirking playfully,” for example). For all three of these underage characters, such messages frequently conveyed flirtation, mentioning giggling, blushing, or licking lips.
While Nomi’s chatbot is not the first to suggest suicide, researchers and critics say that its explicit instructions—and the company’s response—are striking.
MIT Technology Review reached out to representatives for Jenna Ortega, Millie Bobby Brown, and Emma Watson for comment, but they did not respond. Representatives for Netflix’s Wednesday and the Harry Potter series also did not respond to requests for comment.
Ex-Human pointed to Botify AI’s terms of service, which state that the platform cannot be used in ways that violate applicable laws. “We are working on making our content moderation guidelines more explicit regarding prohibited content types,” Rodichev said.
Andreessen Horowitz representatives did not respond to an email containing data on Botify IA conversations and wondered if the chatbots could have interaction in flirtatious or sexually suggestive conversations while incorporating the character of a minor.
According to the company, Botify IA conversations are used for the most general human models that are eliminated for corporate clients. “Our customer product provides valuable knowledge and conversations of millions of interactions with characters, which allows us to offer our facilities to a multitude of B2B customers,” said Rodichev in a subordinate interview in August. “We can respond to appointments, games, influencers and more, which, despite their exclusive cases, percentage of an unusual desire for empathic conversations. ”
One of those consumers is Grindr, who works in an “AI of extreme” that will help users to follow the monitoring of conversations and, possibly, will even be on the date of going out with the agents of the AI of other users. Grindr did not answer questions about his wisdom of robots that represent minor characters in Botify AI.
The former human has not revealed what models of AI used to build his chatbots, and the models have other regulations on legal uses. However, the review of the observed behavior of MIT generation is to violate the maximum of the main policies of policy manufacturers.
For example, the policy for the appropriate use for flame 3, an open source of the primary source, prohibited “exploitation or damage to children, adding the application, creation, acquisition or dissemination of children’s exploitation content. ” OpenAI regulations imply that a style “should not introduce, develop, approve, justify or offer means of choice for sexual content involving minors, whether fictional or real. ” In its products generating AI, Google prohibits the generation or distribution of the content “linked to sexual abuse or exploitation of children”, as well as the “created for pornography or sexual tip”.
Rodivhev, of the ancient human in the past, directed the efforts of AI to Relita, some other corporate corporation of AI. (Several teams of technological ethics have filed a complaint with the American Federal Commission opposite to Relika in January, claiming that corporate chatbots “induce the emotional dependence of users, which caused a wound to consumers. ” In October, other sites from another significant site, the character. Years).
In the really extensive interview in August, Rodichev said he encouraged paintings to allow significant relationships with machines after watching movies such as Elle and Blade Runner. He said that one of the objectives of the ancient temperament products to create an “unclean of chatpt”.
“My vision is that through 2030, our interactions with virtual humans will be more common than biological humans,” he said. “Digital humans have the perspective of remodeling our experiences, which makes the global more empathetic, lovely and attractive. Our purpose is to play a central role in the structure of this platform. »
With a new reasoning style that corresponds to the functionality of Chatgpt O1, Deepseek has controlled innovation restrictions.
A series of startups rush to create models that can produce greater in the software. They claim that it is the shortest path towards Act.
You already know that small language agents and models are the next big things. Here are five other hot trends that you see this year.
The announcement confirms one of the two rumors that surrounded the week. The other spoke of the Superintendent.
© 2025 MIT Technology Review