Laptops are temporarily becoming the go-to solution for the popular music maker. The ability to take them with you and combine them on the pass, as well as participate in mobile recording sessions, make it a much more flexible option. You can move into the Studio, connect your device to existing settings, and prepare all your task files and plugins, making laptops for music production a must-have for any manufacturer or engineer.
There’s a clear preference for Apple machines when it comes to music production, and you’ll find iMacs or Mac Mini as part of the always-on recording setups. This means that buying a MacBook can help you integrate more easily with real-world studies if you collaborate. It’s high on your agenda. If you go the Apple route, it doesn’t get much better than the 16″ MacBook Pro M3, which is an absolute powerhouse for music production.
That said, there are plenty of rugged Windows laptops out there today that are more than comparable to what were once dominant Macs. They’re also cheaper, meaning that if you tend to work on your own or budget is a factor, the offerings from Asus, Samsung and Dell will still do a great job on their latest production. Our top pick for a Windows device is the Dell XPS 17, which features an amazing demo and exceptional performance.
At the end of this article, we have an FAQ segment that will answer any other questions you may have, whether it’s which processor to use with your MacBook or an attempt to answer the age-old debate between Mac and Windows.
Are you looking for a wonderful deal on a laptop?Discover hand-picked savings on the gear we reviewed and stay up to date on this year’s Prime Day music deals.
There’s no doubt that Apple’s artistic genius in music production is the mobile device on which you can enjoy it to the fullest. The 16-inch MacBook Pro offers the most productive battery life here and is a Mac that will last for years sooner than you imagine. they want an update, which is rarely unusual in Apple circles.
Read below
Apple’s newest Pros and Airs feature the newest M3 chips, and only this style retains the M2. But that doesn’t mean it’s missing from the music production department. At just 1. 24kg and just 11. 3mm deep, the Air M2 is still a sleek, compact MacBook option, and the cheapest portable way to create music on Mac.
Read below
The Dell XPS line has built a reputation for its sleek design, stunning displays and demanding specs. They’re touted as the ideal laptops for on-the-go creatives who don’t like subscribing to Apple’s walled garden, and as the closest Windows option to an Apple MacBook Pro.
Read below
Utilizing the newest M3 chips, the 14-inch MacBook Pro style has enough processing power and industry-leading functionality to accommodate even the toughest artistic professionals, making it the all-around computer for music production right now.
Read below
The Air M3 is available in two lengths: 13 and 15 inches. We prefer the larger screen length for music creation. We ran several benchmark tests between the Air M2 and this new M3, and found that in Ableton Live, we got a 25% increase in functionality for the M3, coming in to 30% in Logic.
Read below
For Windows fans, their Pill Slash line of crossover computers is a tough choice when it comes to their next music production computer. The Microsoft Surface Pro nine is a true beast of a machine, ideal for music-intensive projects.
Read below
The Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro gives you a look and feel of an Apple MacBook, but in the world of Windows. In terms of performance, it ranks around or just above the same benchmarks as the 13″ MacBook Air M2.
Read below
With the Swift X14, Acer has packed a rugged processor and GPU into a narrow Ultrabook and complemented it with a beautiful OLED display. And while it’s not quite up there with a 14″ MacBook Pro, it’s among the most productive Ultrabooks you’ll find. can get.
Read below
However, with the Razer Blade 15 Studio, we have a monstrously rugged computer with its origins in the gaming world, but with artistic interests as its primary focus. It’s more than rugged enough to take care of CPU-intensive responsibilities with multiple plugins. and we love the clarity of the screen.
Read below
Our opinion:
If you want to know what the world’s most productive computer for creating music is right now, you can probably guess that it’s packed with power, has the Apple logo on top, and costs a lot. We’re entering here into the Mac and PC war for supremacy in computer music production (there are many who will argue in your favor on both sides of the coin, and we’ve got more in our buying tips at the end of this consultant), but there’s certainly Apple’s artistic talent. Genius in music production. And it’s the cellular device that deserves all the credit.
Design: The look and feel of the MacBook Pro M3 are simply sumptuous. Everything is superbly combined and many will be pleased to see the absence of the dreaded Touch Bar. The aluminum monocoque gives you a real sense of durability and its sublime appearance. it is time for none.
There are plenty of ports available to connect your audio interface and any other peripherals you have with 3 Thunderbolt/USB 4 ports, with a dedicated HDMI if you want to connect it to a larger screen and an SDXC card slot if you want. additional storage.
Features: Both 16″ Pro styles offer wonderful music production with their giant 16. 2″ presentations (the giant screen is just one style in this variety), but, in reality, you’re seeing a big difference in value compared to other Macs. The display is, though, and if you’re running exclusively on a computer screen, that extra area will be convenient in projects with a lot of plugins.
Performance: The fully optimized MacBook Pro, in this case with the new M3 Max processor, is probably too much (in fact it’s fine) for many music tasks. We rarely use our 24GB of RAM Air, but the raw Max starts at 48GB of RAM!Similarly, you shouldn’t pay an exorbitant extra for an 8TB storage option, while a decent separate fast hard drive will bolster the basic 1TB model for a much lower cost.
You can get a cheaper 16-inch MacBook Pro option with the M3 Pro processor, which, with a price drop of (roughly) 20% compared to the full M3 Max, is also a cheaper deal.
Battery life: However, the 16-inch MacBook Pro offers the most productive battery life, with up to 22 hours. This statistic is probably just for navigation, so for actual music-making tasks, we think this number will be a little less than That. Reports recommend that you can still take advantage of 15 to 17 hours, even when you’re doing more extensive tasks, which is pretty phenomenal functionality considering all aspects.
To conclude, this is a Mac that will last for years before you think you want an upgrade, which isn’t unusual in Apple circles, so if you’re wondering what to buy us for Christmas, we can seamlessly fill up those 8TB and 128GB. of RAM if you would drive us. . . So, move on.
Our opinion:
Apple’s newest MacBook Pro and Air feature the company’s newest M3 chips, and this style retains the M2, but that doesn’t mean it’s lacking in the music production department.
Design: At just 1. 24kg and 11. 3mm deep, the Air M2 is still a fabulously portable choice, and its lack of a fan also gives it a noise merit when it comes to making music. As with all Apple devices, everything feels super fluid; literally, the MacBook Air is slippery too, so be careful when taking it out of your bag.
Features: You probably won’t use them to combine, but the sound of the speakers is very smart with Spatial Audio and it’s definitely a smart choice to check your combination as part of your regular tests. The screen is rarely the biggest here, so you might find things a little cluttered, but it’s actually beautiful and offers a great, crisp display, ideal for a deep dive into waveforms.
Performance: In terms of power, it’s not as fast as some of the beefier MacBook Pro models, but it’s not slow either. The M2 chip reproduces the main primary musical functions surprisingly well. The only thing we discovered about success was creating orchestral scores with many VST instruments, but for normal musical creation, find a lot of strength here.
Battery life: The Air’s battery life is smart, estimated at 18 hours and more than comparable to most Windows laptops. As always, the actual usage will be different and will likely be less than the number listed. Our MacBook Air M2 offers exceptional battery life, with a smart 6-hour battery life with plenty of battery life despite a full day of mixing and recording.
The Air M2 is still a sleek, compact MacBook option, and the cheapest portable way to start creating music on Mac. It’s still capable of maxing out music tasks, but you might need the Air M3 if you have extra money for 20-25% accumulating power.
Read our full Apple MacBook Air M2
Our opinion:
Despite its popularity, not everyone needs to use Mac OS to create music. Thankfully, there are plenty of wonderful features for Windows users, and ours is the Dell XPS 17, thanks in large part to that giant screen.
Design: Otherwise, the XPS 17 (and we also reviewed the mid-range 9730 model) is a fantastic laptop. It has a sleek design and enough power that you can use it on any desktop computer.
As with many laptops, you can largely configure the specs, but as you can see from the wide price range, this adds up temporarily and you can easily pay around $4,000/£3,500 for those delicious extras.
Features: Sometimes you can feel limited when using a computer monitor for music production, and that’s when you want to turn to a device like the Dell XPS 17. With a massive 17-inch display in all configurations, it’s by far the largest computer. Here, that clearly makes it one of the least portable.
Whichever option you choose, you’ll get an impressive display, especially with the UHD upgrade, and while we’ve found 13″ laptops restrictive for music creation, you might not run out of space in any of the 17″ configurations.
Performance: The Dell XPS 17 packs a lot of power. For music, gaming, and even a little paint if needed, this computer delivers. Bulky compared to some, yes, but you might not worry about the extra weight when you’re immersed in that beautiful display.
With plenty of room for plugins and tools and a powerful Intel processor, it’s more than capable of being a solid running tool for making music. We recommend going for the 32GB model if you have the budget, as it allows for even the most ambitious music projects.
Battery life: Despite the estimated battery life of 14 hours, this great demo consumes a lot of power, especially at peak brightness. The actual results for us ended up being around 8 hours, which is particularly less than some of the others they offer. This isn’t bad by any means, but if you’re working offline, it’s definitely something to consider.
Windows is rarely the dirty word it used to be when it came to creating music, so don’t feel bad if you stick to what you know. The Dell XPS 17 is more than capable of competing with Apple machines in terms of power, and Windows is a pretty smart pick for music creation of all kinds.
Our opinion:
We’ve included the 16-inch MacBook Pro as our pick for the toughest computer in this guide, as it’s in fact the most productive mobile computer for music production, with the longest screen length and power you could ever need. (but not necessarily necessary). But the 14-inch MacBook Pro represents the cheapest way to get that cellular power, with a few caveats.
Design: As with all Apple machines, the design is surely top notch. Its shorter length makes it fantastic and portable, although it’s still quite bulky compared to the ultra-thin MacBook Air. It is also ultra-strong thanks to this aluminum construction.
Features: At the lower end of the range, you can get a 14″ MacBook Pro for less than $2,000 with a popular M3 processor, but our tests showed that the M3 Air has the same power and a larger screen, which is why it also ranks high in this guide. So really, if you’re looking for a smaller 14-inch display, you might need to take advantage of this machine’s faster M3 Pro or Max processors, but either way, it will temporarily increase the asking price.
However, if you dig deeper into the 14″ MacBook Pro lineup, and there’s a spec for everyone (and we may have filled this consultant with other configurations), you’ll be able to find a style that balances value and power.
Performance: M3 chips offer some of the most productive features you can find for a music production laptop. It has plenty of power to run VSTs and plugins, and with the superior RAM features available, you’ll be future-proofed for many years to come.
It’s smooth, even in the largest task files, and all very temporarily thanks to the SSD. Of course, as is often the case with a Mac, you may need to turn off automatic updates, as recent iOS settings have prevented users from certain add-ons.
Battery life: The newest MacBook Pros offer one of the most productive battery life seen in recent memory. Offering up to 17 hours on the spec list, we found that, as usual, you get less in real-world use, but still deliver impressive performance, enough to get a smart combine without having to plug it in.
The 14″ MacBook Pro is a fantastic device, or even a lot of smart devices, but you need to decide which one you want carefully. There’s a device here for everyone, but you may have to do some research (and do some math) to locate it. .
Our opinion:
Apple has now updated all of its laptops with the newest M3 chip lineup. Only the Air with the older M2 processor is still available if you’re looking for something a little cheaper.
Design: The ultra-sleek design of the MacBook Air M3 is ideal for those who want a computer that can handle them. It’s ultra-lightweight, slim enough to have compatibility in a backpack with plenty of headroom, and it’s also available in 4 other colors.
Features: The Air M3 tested here is available in two lengths: 13 inches (actually, 13. 6 inches) and 15 inches (15. 3 inches). We prefer the larger screen length for music creation and have discovered the 13-inch one. Laptops were restrictive in the past. With just two Thunderbolt 4/USB-C ports, you’ll definitely want a USB hub for most music-making tasks.
Performance: We ran several benchmark tests between the Air M2 and this new M3, and found that in Ableton Live, we got a 25% functionality increase for the M3, coming in at 30% in Logic, more than even Apple claims. ! Our sister TechRadar even suggests that the multi-core stats of the Air M3 are on par with those of the entry-level MacBook Pro M3.
In our opinion, the M3 Air is a better buy than the entry-level MacBook Pro style because it has a larger screen and equivalent power, but it costs less. We also found in our testing that the larger 15″ style sounds better from its own speakers. than the air of 13″.
Battery life: As with all recent M3 MacBooks, we found the battery life to be simply excellent. Even under heavy load, it lasts for hours, allowing you to get the most out of your combination without having to plug it into an outlet.
Combine functionality with the Air’s quiet operation, sleek design, and larger screen, and we think the 15-inch Air M3 is lately one of the laptops for cellular music production.
Read our full Apple MacBook Air M3
Our opinion:
For Windows fans, their line of crossover laptops for slash tablets is a left-handed option, but potentially difficult when it comes to your next music production laptop.
Design: The demo surprises thanks to its 120Hz refresh rate, which means everything looks incredibly detailed and runs smoothly. It also has a ten-point multi-touch capture capability, which offers wonderful features for manufacturers that allow you to make changes temporarily without having to use the mouse. The ability to temporarily split it and turn it into a pill is a wonderful feature overall, whether or not you’re in music production.
Features: Microsoft Surface Pro nine is a real beast of a machine, featuring a 12th generation i7 processor, 16GB of RAM, and a 256GB SSD, making it more than suitable for large music projects on the go or in the studio.
Performance: In our tests, it performed admirably with a massive ProTools project, running over two hundred tracks with an ASIO buffer length of 64 before we noticed pops and clicks. Compatibility is also great, as at the time of writing, there are no known issues with plugins and Windows 11, unlike a secure and popular operating system.
Battery life: In our tests, we found that the battery life is pretty good, but it’s nowhere near the 15. 5 hours indicated when mixing a track. As usual, those numbers are probably for consultation only, so it’s no surprise that they don’t last. so long. In fact, it held its own, but it didn’t last as long as some of the MacBooks offered here.
If you’re not in a position to pass the MacBook’s direction and need something ultra-versatile, the Surface Pro nine is a great choice. The ability to split it and use it as a tablet can also be a checkbox for any manufacturer. Moonlighting in live sound.
Read the full Microsoft Surface Pro nine review
Our opinion:
The Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro gives you a similar look and feel to an Apple MacBook, but in the Windows world. If you don’t see yourself running MacOS, then this is the computer you should try.
Design: This is a derivative design that is transparent to the naked eye of the Galaxy Book4. It’s not as sleek as an Apple machine, but it’s not bad either and the overall feel is excellent and sturdy.
Features: The Galaxy Book4 Pro is available in 14″ and 16″ models and its OLED screen is a major advantage with symbol quality and 120Hz refresh. It also outperforms Apple devices with touch input. There is quite a lot of connectivity, there are others with more slots for MIDI controllers and your audio interface.
Performance: In terms of performance, it ranks around or just above the same benchmarks as the 13″ MacBook Air M2. However, compared to Apple machines, their speakers disappoint; It’s not that we present computer speakers for a detailed combination, but in general terms. Listening to music, they are not the best.
Battery life: Samsung gave us around ten hours of battery life, which is fine, in fact, it’s enough to order a combine if you know what you’re doing. Of course, if you have lighter responsibilities or just sail, you’ll probably get a lot more out of it.
Overall, this is one of the MacBook’s opportunities and a wonderful computer for full-blown music production.
Our opinion:
While it’s not quite up there with a 14″ MacBook Pro, the Acer Swift X14 is among the most productive Ultrabooks you can get.
Design: With the Swift X14, Acer has packed a rugged CPU and GPU into a slim Ultrabook and complemented it with a beautiful OLED display. It’s also wonderful and portable, making it a great choice to pair on the go. It’s wonderful and strong with Flexione to a minimum laptop, which means you’ll take care of storing it in a backpack and using it on the go.
Features: The OLED screen is the real star of the show, surely impressive. Ideal if you also want a device suitable for watching movies. It also has a lot of connectivity, especially compared to something like the MacBook Air. This means that you probably don’t want to use a USB hub, which is one less item you should take with you when you’re traveling.
Performance: It gives a lot of strength to multitask here, making it very suitable for music production tasks. It doesn’t perform as well in benchmarking as some of the others on this list, but it’s indeed a capable kit. In terms of performance, the Acer Swift X14 can’t do much – it’s a small device that will take care of a lot of musical tasks.
Battery life: This is the cheapest device and the battery life of around 8 hours when running at full strength is something worth noting. It’s the worst on the market, but there are others on this list that work much better.
The Acer Swift X14 is a reasonable device, but this price makes sense when you think about power and display, and we think it’s one of the most productive compact options for music.
Our opinion:
Think of a gaming computer and imagine bold colors, RGB lighting fixtures all over the store, and enough power under the hood to light up a continent. However, with the Razer Blade 15 Studio, we have a monstrously rugged computer with its origins in the gaming world, but with artistic interests as its primary focus.
Design: There are some fantastic visual touches and customizable RGB backlighting on the keys, but it’s not one of those brightly colored gaming beasts that turn heads, at least on the surface. It looks professional, so you may not feel out of place. position when you enter the studio with him. It’s also nice and slim, best for traveling.
Features: With plenty of processing power and a huge RAM capacity from 32GB to 64GB, you definitely won’t run out of many multitasking plugins in a giant task file. The spec sheet is impressive and it also comes with a very sturdy GeForce. RTX GPU, so if you’re a gamer or a video editor, this computer will make you happy.
Performance: Gaming laptops are rugged enough for music creation, as they require powerful processors and plenty of RAM to run. We found the Razer Blade to be tough enough to take on CPU-intensive responsibilities with multiple plugins, and we love it. the clarity of the OLED screen.
Battery life: This is a sturdy computer and if you play with it, don’t expect to get much battery life. We spent about 5-6 hours doing music-making tasks, which is impressive at first glance. but, certainly, enough to overcome a harvest in the blink of an eye.
This is a very rugged and incredibly expensive laptop, so it’s only suitable for musicians who surely want to play CyberPunk 2077 alongside their usual music-making tasks.
Choosing a computer that can run CPU-intensive audio production jobs can be tricky. Some features greatly affect battery life. Others use functionality and prioritize higher-quality processors (CPUs) to ensure fast operation. Add to that the differences in screen size. aesthetics, and many other variables and we can easily see how complicated it is to justify buying one style over another.
There are safe features that you will look for in a laptop, whether it is generating music or editing videos. In other words, it is looking for the right balance between power, performance and price. But don’t worry, because right now there are some incredibly capable laptops at very moderate costs. So, what are the features that make a production laptop wonderful?
Ultimately, when we talk about performance, in this context, we mean how quickly the computer can process things and how long it can access, write, and modify stored knowledge. If you’re a sample-based manufacturer and have gigabytes of loops and one-shots stored, then you need to focus on a device that provides lightning-fast access to your stored media. And, while they’re a bit more expensive than classic hard drives (HDDs), the only genuine option these days is a computer. with a forged state drive (SSD). Solid state means no moving parts, so there’s nothing wrong or wrong, but with fast movement speeds so you don’t have to wait for that pesky progress bar.
Essentially, a faster processor (or CPU) means two things: your computer can take over more of the responsibilities assigned to it, and it can “process” those things much faster. You may only see small differences; Maybe an audio recording plays back a minute faster the faster the processor, but over time, obviously, it adds up.
In the world of CPUs, there are two main players. Intel is the big name, with a huge share of the market. Intel’s diversity ranges from the i3, the least resilient, to the i9. However, the i5 and i7 variants are the most important in mid-to-high-end laptops, and in this sphere it has other speed ratings, measured in gigahertz, as well as the ability to spice up the turbo when you put the computer under primary stress.
With newer machines, you may find that the “i” has been removed and the line is called Core 3/5/7/9.
The other call to take into account is AMD, which produces Ryzen processors. These stick to a similar nomenclature to the Intel versions, i. e. , R3, R5, R9, etc. , and are popular with gamers.
Apple has a wonderful legacy in the generation of machines designed for artistic pursuits, and just when others are catching up, it’s flipping the script again. You may have noticed the newest Apple machines with their “M” diversity chips inside. These necessarily combine many of the laptop’s internal components on a single chip, resulting in incredible overall formula power and efficiency. Apple’s latest machines feature the M2, M2 Pro, M2 Max, M2 Ultra, M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max chips. M2 vs M3 Macs in more detail in this article.
The good news is that those gains are sure to provide advantages to producers, as they provide best-in-class processing functionality and functionality, while also providing longer battery life and other optimizations. In a nutshell, Logic Pro X users on an M3-based device are lately in the DAW package. The bad news, however, is that many third-party software brands have yet to make the replacement to get the most out of it. Others are gaining momentum, with big names like Ableton and Akai offering full locations. support.
The most productive recommendation we can give you is to do your studies: all the mainstream developers know about the new chips and they’re probably running with local support, so it’s up to your existing configuration and preference to change things up. If you can and don’t expect any major issues, we recommend you take a look at these new MacBook models.
Until the end of 2020, Apple computers used Intel processors, the same type found in most PCs. Since then, the company has brought its line of M chips, so far the M1 and M2 lines and the latest M3, M3 Pro and M3 Max. (currently available on the latest MacBook Air and MacBook Pro). These combine the CPU (central processing unit) and GPU (graphics processing unit) on a single chip, each indicated through multiple cores, and the more the better.
The base M2 processor has 8 or 10 cores and is found in Air and Mac Mini with faster M2 processors in Mac Studio and Mac Pro. Mac Studio has either an M2 Max (12-core CPU, 30-core GPU) or a maximum M2 Ultra chip with up to a 24-core CPU and a 76-core GPU. The Mac Pro, on the other hand, also has a maximum M2 Ultra chip (up to 24 CPU cores and 76 GPU cores).
The M3 processor increases the number of cores to a maximum of 16 CPUs and 40 GPUs and variants of the M3 can be found in the 14″ and 16″ iMac, Air and MacBook Pros. The variants are M3, M3 Pro and M3. Max.
If all this communication about the M-series processors is confusing, just one fact. In our tests, the M-series outperformed the original Intel Mac processors by at least 3 to one, so no matter which M-chip you choose, expect a big gain over your older Intel Mac.
With RAM, as mentioned, you can skip the “minimum specs” indexed in the main DAWs. Anyone who wants to run an Ableton Live multitrack query on a computer with 4GB of RAM is braver (or more patient) than we are.
This is because RAM is your machine’s short-term memory. With audio applications, especially those that involve a large amount of recorded audio, a higher amount of RAM means that your audio playback is sleek and smooth, as the computer doesn’t want to “recover” audio from the hard drive every time it needs to be played.
If you’re shopping now, thinking about the next few years of use, we recommend that 8GB of DDR4 memory is the absolute minimum you’re looking for. Ideally, you would need 16GB, as this will take care of much larger arrangements. , even if that additional resource comes at a cost.
It’s also worth checking if the computer you choose can be upgraded with additional RAM in the future. Fans of Apple computers might not have that luxury, due to its sealed chassis, but computer users might.
Storage memory comes in second. For audio applications, especially those involving pattern libraries in which audio is streamed from disk, it is necessary to use a forged state drive (SSD). The merit of those drives is the fast knowledge transfer, which means that files load faster, although they are a bit more expensive than their hard disk (HDD) equivalent. However, for music production applications, the additional expense is fully justified.
However, it’s not uncommon to see a combination being used: a hard drive to store files, images, and videos, and an SSD for tasks that require more instant responses. The option is to use external hard drives; SSDs, especially those that leverage USB-C technology, are more than capable of achieving the kinds of motion speeds needed for music production.
So we believe this debate will continue for eternity, with many evangelizing the Windows infrastructure, while others will remain loyal to Apple. There will always be two sides, but in reality, one or the other will be very useful for making music on those days. .
That said, if money isn’t usually a big deal, we set out to explore Apple’s path: it’s no coincidence that four of Apple’s five most productive music production laptops have the Apple logo. They work for music only, with state-of-the-art hardware and optimized audio specs, and as M-series chips continue to evolve and developers invest in the cooperation of their software and plugins, creating music on Apple machines will continue to be firmly ahead of gaming.
Of course, not all manufacturers have the budget for Apple and there are so many wonderful Windows opportunities in this consultant that will perform a similar task for much cheaper, with the added bonus of being able to upgrade hardware like RAM to keep up. Gameplay: A feature that is obviously missing from Apple machines.
So, there are obviously a lot of things that need to be done when opting for the most productive computer for music production.
It’s easy to see why a smart, versatile computer can cost a hefty price tag, but, as with everything from the best studio samplers and monitors to home studio mixers, you get what you pay for, so it’s always sensible. to get the most productive. You can do so, rather than skimping and regretting your acquisition later (often faster than you thought). Our price comparison software will come in handy here. Alongside access to each product in this guide, our pricing widgets show you the most productive online deals right now so you don’t have to shop around.
In this guide, we don’t concentrate on the existing details, such as the number of USB sockets, or lack thereof, for your audio interface, etc. With so many dongle and docking station features available, this shouldn’t be a problem. – a decisive factor in your buying process. In this guide, we talk about the natural force for music creation. For example, can your laptop handle giant multitrack sessions, running a handful of plug-ins and MIDI instruments?
When evaluating a computer for music production, we take into consideration various facets of design, features, and power. In essence, a music production computer deserves to be portable and powerful. For the latter, keep in mind, that’s why we come with those gaming computers as they are designed to bear weight.
Obviously, a lightweight design is ideal, but we also need connections: Thunderbolt, USB-C, or even A for older interfaces. Really, the more the better, although most Apple laptops now only have a few Thunderbolt 3 ports. that you can get away with listening to music.
In terms of power, it’s tricky to compare processors based on their specs alone, as they can perform very differently in a real-world music production environment. With this in mind, whenever possible, we compare and contrast the use of popular DAW assignments such as www. logicprohelp. com and www. music-prod. com. Here, you simply run the task and load audio tracks until your device drops. You then get an idea of how rugged a specific processor is in a real-world production scenario.
Finally, we’ll also look at demo functionality and speakers. In fact, Apple excels in this domain with new speaker designs that can (only) be used for mixing and dynamic presentations that help you see everything your DAW has. offer.
Learn more about how we verify music creation devices and on MusicRadar.
I deal with reviews on MusicRadar and in Future Music magazine, although I am rarely seen in front of a camera that does not communicate much in the presence of genuine musicians. For over 30 years, I haven’t been able to make a decision which tool to master, so I haven’t worried about it. Currently, I’m a lover of all things high gain guitar and I’m never one to resist generating funky and inferior breaks like I’ve never heard.
“Easy to use, with high-saturation style effects”: Universal Audio Verve Analog Machines review
“The bass coming out of the back of my car is relaxing. I use a Cadillac Fleetwood”: look at the good set of Beasties wheels.
“It’s compact, it’s ready to live in. . . but it’s still the engine of an older synthesizer”: Korg King reviewKorg Neo
MusicRadar is from Future plc, a leading foreign media organization and virtual publisher. Visit our corporate website.