We live in a world where the generation has become so reasonable that it’s completely imaginable to make quality recordings from the comfort of your bedroom. Audio interfaces can be had for less than $100, decent condenser and dynamic microphones are even more reasonable and with a lot of wisdom that can be obtained online, there are no limits when it comes to creating music.
The vast majority of musicians find it difficult to buy more equipment. We all think that the new bass will make our rock recordings harder, that the newest AI-powered EQ plugin will be our mixing game, and that those beloved new studio monitors are safe. This will significantly affect our mastering capabilities. But does more expensive audio interfere with the quality of your recordings?
Spending more on gadgets will have some effect on the quality of your recording, otherwise studios wouldn’t have tens of thousands of dollars worth of outdoor gadgets inside. There is no doubt that upgrading to an audio interface from a computer or local sound card will offer a significant improvement. But at the home studio level, is a $100 interface compared to a $1,000 interface really that far away in terms of quality?Figure out. . .
For us, the quality of an audio interface comes down to a few decided factors. These measurements largely coincide with the way audio interface brands verify their own devices and are the ones presented in their list of specifications. Of course, there are other parts and measurements, but for the most part, they’re a smart indicator of the overall quality of an audio interface.
The equivalent input noise, abbreviated as EIN, is the result of the output noise divided by the gain reading. A typical check is to connect a microphone to the interface at maximum gain and measure the point of noise it generates. subtracting the amount of gain from the measured noise point, you will get an EIN figure.
EIN determines how much noise a microphone preamp will load on your signal, and that’s why you’ll see audio interfaces referred to as “low-noise” or “clean” when it comes to your microphone preamps. Each microphone preamp loads a safe point of noise to your signal, regardless of its quality. A smart microphone preamp will allow you to record quiet resources without inducing too much noise to the point of rendering the signal useless in your recording.
The latency figure measures the time it takes for the sign to enter your interface, to your computer, through drivers or software, and then back to your monitors or studio headphones. This number is partly affected by the computer you are using as well as the drivers and software, which means you may not see this number indexed in the spec list.
Latency is vital basically for tracking, as you don’t need any delay between what you’re playing or doing a song and what you’re listening to through your monitors or headphones. Therefore, lower latency numbers are better. Latency can be the component of funcionalidad. de your recording, which, as we’ll come back to later, is one of the most critical elements of creating high-quality music. This is especially important for those using a live interface.
Dynamic diversity is the difference between the lowest and loudest sounds that the audio interface can process. The lowest number is any detectable signal above the noise level of the interface, while the point is the maximum input signal it can handle. The wider the dynamic diversity of an audio interface, the more flexibility it has in terms of gain degrees when mimicking instruments.
Of course, it’s highly unlikely that you’ll record a source that goes from the minimum signal point to the maximum, so it really comes down to having room to record very strong signals rather than very weak signals. A wide dynamic diversity regularly indicates that an audio interface consists of high-quality intelligent components.
Probably the least useful of all the measurements indexed here, frequency reaction covers the diversity of sounds that an audio interface can reproduce. Generally, this is between 20 Hz and 20 kHz, which covers the limit of human hearing. Most modern audio interfaces will have a full frequency reaction and it’s rare to find anything else.
You’ll find interfaces with specs that deliver higher frequencies, up to 40kHz diversity, but that doesn’t matter unless you’re recording at higher pattern speeds. Frequency diversity will be measured with possible discounts or increases in frequency diversity, periodically. denoted as “± 1 dB”. More expensive models will significantly reduce this figure, and those discounts and increases occur at the upper and lower ends of the sound spectrum.
Another spec that is not unusual to see is bit intensity and pattern rate. The latter is the number of audio patterns taken through its interface, both in one and both seconds. The first is the number of bits of data in both patterns. The usual format used in music is 24-bit, 44. 1 KHz, although, as computers have become more resilient and hard disk space has become cheaper, it is very likely that engineers will also use 48 KHz.
Most audio interfaces support 16-bit and 24-bit, with some going as high as 32-bit, although you’re unlikely to see them at the home recording level. Sample rate diversity from 44. 1 KHz, which is the most popular for CDs. and customer audio, at 48 KHz, which is usually used for video, and more recently for audio, ending with 96 KHz and 192 KHz. In terms of quality, higher numbers are better, but the higher you go, the less you’ll notice a big jump in quality.
Now that we know what the objective quality of an audio interface is, can the quality of an interface be?Well, not really. The biggest challenge is that brands use other testing methodologies to arrive at those numbers. For example, some interfaces may have had EIN degrees measured with the input gain increased, while others may have set it to a minimum. Some may have simply been used with a dummy charge at a certain ohm level, while others used another.
Some numbers may have “A-weighting,” which is an adjustment made to readings to account for human hearing. For example, when measuring dynamic range, a number will emphasize (i. e. , weight) the component of frequencies that the human ear is very sensitive to, resulting in a different (and usually more enjoyable) reading of an unweighted A-weighted result.
Some brands make it very clear in their specifications whether the figure is A-weighted or what type of dummy load is used to perform the test, but not all of them are like this. This means that there would possibly be differences between what you get the genuine global and what the spec list tells you the interface can do.
If you compare the specifications of any modern audio interface at the home studio level, you will see that their specifications are very similar. Compared to twenty years ago, the quality of today’s audio interfaces is incredibly high and most of the differences will be virtually imperceptible unless you have the best acoustic environment to pay attention to or incredibly well-trained ears.
So, to answer the question at the beginning of this article, will buying a new audio interface affect the sound quality?Yes, but only to a very small extent, which will go virtually unnoticed by anyone who isn’t a professional engineer. If you have a twenty-year-old interface, then of course a newer interface will give you noticeable results, but switching from a third-generation Scarlett to a fourth-generation one?The difference in quality is minimal, it is the characteristics that have d.
So if this shiny new interface doesn’t give you a drastic change, how can they improve their recordings?Here are some of our most sensible tips for achieving a product with a higher quality finish:
Acoustic remedy: More than anything else, having a smart listening room will improve the quality of your mix and, therefore, your recordings. If you have a budget of $/£1000, you probably deserve to spend 50% on processing and rest on studio monitors/audio interface/studio headphones. A treated room will also be larger for recording, which means less unwanted reflections and noise when employing a microphone.
Composition and performance: With all of our complicated gadgets in the age of fashion, we focus on the most critical parts of any clever song, composition, and functionality. The functionality facet is why old recordings from the ’60s and ’70s still sound wonderful today, despite being recorded with curtains that would be considered inferior to anything available in the age of fashion. Choosing timing, intonation, dynamics, and composition will do much more for your music than buying some other device.
Use Reference Tracks: A reference track is an incredibly useful tool that is overlooked in favor of the newer, more complicated AI mastering plugin. But reference tracks are used in almost any and all professional engineers, because it provides them with something to direct their harvest towards. A track recorded by a professional at a point that matches yours will show you what your group is missing compared to others in the genre, allowing you to make combination decisions in context and not in a vacuum.
Hopefully, this will give you a little more insight into how audio interfaces work and ensure that you can get your music to the same point as your peers with a little effort. We reiterate that in terms of the home studio interface, between $100 and $500, there is no noticeable difference. It’s the song itself, the room you’re mixing and recording in, and other miscellaneous points that will determine the overall quality of your recording.
Of course, once you start hitting the $1,000 mark and above, you’ll see a difference in quality; Again, you’ll need an experienced pair of ears and a wonderful listening environment to notice those differences. Try not to live too long It depends on the value of your device, and instead focus on processing the piece, putting your song in the most productive condition imaginable, and employing reference tracks to make your mixes truly impactful.
Matt is a junior task editor here at MusicRadar. Test and review musical devices with special attention to audio interfaces, studio headphones, studio monitors, and just about anything similar to home recording. Matt worked in music retail for five years at Dawsons Music and Northwest Guitars and has written for a variety of music sites, including Guitar World, Guitar Player, Guitar. com, Ultimate Guitar, and Thomann’s t. blog. A regular performer with over 20 years’ experience in live and band production, he’s played everything from jazz to djent, performing all over the UK in darker venues than you can play with a matching guitar.
How to connect a studio to your audio interface
“I feel like if I don’t do it from a laugh angle now, I’m going to freak out!”: Mars Volta’s Philo Tsoungui plays drums on Rush and LimeLight after hearing it for the first time.
MusicRadar is from Future plc, a leading foreign media organization and virtual publisher. Visit our corporate website.